Meet Kevin Richardson, The Alleged 'Lion Whisperer' - What Do You Think Of His Practices?

Meet Kevin Richardson, The Alleged 'Lion Whisperer' - What Do You Think Of His Practices?

Posted by Ellie Hutchin on 20th Nov 2017

The lion is renowned for being The King of his domain, majestic and magnificent as they prowl across African landscapes. As an apex predator, and thus a key component of the ecosystem, the lion once spent its days roaming across the bush, hunting prey and socialising with pride members. Today, however, a wild lion’s daily endeavours are not so simple. Each day is a fight for survival for these fascinating felines, due to mass habitat loss, poaching, the wildlife trade, and more.

African Lion

As some of you may already know, the populations of the African lion have dwindled drastically over the last 50 years. In the 1960s, populations were at around 200,000 but it is now estimated that less than 20,000 lions are roaming the plains of Africa today. WWF has classified the species as vulnerable, and the rate of their decline is on the rise.

Fortunately, there are passionate conservationists and zoologists out there who are dedicated to lion conservation. They spend their lives contributing to the preservation of the species, encouraging and imploring others along the way to join the cause. One person who claims to be an advocate for lion conservation is the world-renowned Kevin Richardson, otherwise known as ‘The Lion Whisperer’.

Who Is Kevin Richardson?

Photo credit: Kevin Richardson's Instagram @lionwhisperersa

Richardson is famous for the unique relationships he has formed with the lions which reside at his sanctuary in South Africa. As seen in the video below, Richardson has been branded ‘The Lion Whisperer’ due to his ability to interact on a peculiar level with lions. In his videos you will watch a beast, weighing on average around 420 lbs, bounding toward Richardson, only to embrace him in what seems to be an almighty lion hug, wrapping huge paws around his neck, and licking his face.

Kevin claims to have been accepted as a member of his captive prides through education of lion behaviour, and an understanding of the animals on both a physical and emotional level, and does not fear for his safety around the lions. You will even see him cooing at the animals, and as one has a playful tumble, Kevin laughs, “oh my girl!”, and as he is approached by a huge male, he greets him softly with, “hello my boy.”

Using the fame he has acquired through his relationship with lions as a platform, Richardson claims he strives to shed light on the beauty and majesty of these animals and why it is so important that they are preserved. But is he doing the right thing?

Kevin Richardson’s relationship with lions is a controversial topic that has sparked much debate. Conservation is an extremely complex thing, surrounded by even more complex factors, (which will be discussed further along in this piece) but a global issue nonetheless. Therefore, The Great Projects want to know your opinion regarding the work of Kevin Richardson, and whether you agree or disagree with his practises.

However, we thought we would supply you with a breakdown of the debate so far to help you form an opinion…

Where Did It All Begin?

Photo credit: Kevin Richardson's Instagram @lionwhisperersa

Richardson’s story begins as a young man who began working with lions in captivity in South Africa. It was known to be an institution where people could come and play with lion cubs, and before the cubs reached an age of around 20 months, people could participate in walks with them. Here, Richardson began to develop his unique bond with 2 lion cubs (as well as hyenas and other carnivores) but quickly discovered the negative impact the industry can have on the animals.

Kevin explains in many of his videos and interviews with journalists what really happens to the lions after they have fulfilled the insatiable demand for hugs and walks. He explains, at the time, this kind of industry offered huge financial gain but with little education or consideration regarding animal welfare. When the animals exceeded the age of 20 months, they were deemed too dangerous to interact with humans, and Richardson realised their fate from that point onwards was far more sinister than members of the public who supported this industry could ever imagine.

Some lions would be donated to surrounding zoos or other facilities where they could live out the rest of their days, but not necessarily in conditions that were suitable to provide a captive big cat with a stimulating and happy life. But what’s more, all too often they would be sold into what is branded ‘The Canned Hunting Industry’, where they would eventually be hunted as a trophy for a large fee.

A Sinister Industry - Destined For The Bullet

Trophy Hunting Lions

Photo credit: Rex Shutterstock. Walter Palmer, safari trophy hunting.

Canned hunting is an escalating yet legal trade in South Africa. According to, in 2012, canned hunting generated a profit that was equal to around $70 million. Some people may wonder what the difference between trophy hunting and canned hunting is: canned hunters pay to kill captive lions in enclosures, and trophy hunters employ a ‘fair chase’ mentality and will hunt wild lions.

Fiona Miles, the director of LIONSROCK, (a sanctuary in Bethlehem that cares for lions that have come from private captivity, circuses and zoos with inadequate living conditions) spoke to Africa Geographic about the reality of the journey of lion cubs to the sanctuaries where they then spend their first years interacting with humans. She says:

“the majority of cubs encountered at facilities where interaction is provided are the product of intensive captive breeding or farming. These cubs are removed from their mother as young as possible and hand raised.”


She explains that the reason this is done is because the cubs raise a great deal of funds through interaction as we already know, but also because the lioness can then go into season sooner (therefore quickly having more cubs to supply to the industry) than if she had to spend time raising her young.

Something that Richardson learned during his time at the lion park, was that there was an undeniable chain between cub-petting and the canned hunting industry: once the cubs were too unpredictable to be petted or walked with, and in turn ‘not profitable’, they were, as Richardson claims, ‘destined for the bullet’. In 2013, he became an advocate for the Campaign Against Canned Lion Hunting (CACLH), in an attempt to preserve lion populations that are still rapidly decreasing.

His work contributes directly to the Protecting African Wildlife Conservation Trust which actively funds the conservation of lions and leopards.

Kevin’s Campaign For Carnivores

Over the years, Kevin built relationships with many lions in his care and, in 2011, moved them to a new facility, cutting all ties with the park he previously worked in. The lions new home was to be in the Southeast boundary of the Welgedacht Game Reserve, within the borders of the Dinokeng Big 5 reserve in Pretoria, South Africa.

Nowadays, what started with Kevin moving captive lions and other carnivores to a new home, is now ‘The Kevin Richardson Wildlife Sanctuary’, comprised of 1200 hectares, with carnivorous residents including not only lion, but both spotted and striped hyena and black leopard. The sanctuary has a mission of providing ‘a self-sustaining African carnivore sanctuary for the purpose of wild species preservation.’

As part of the fight against canned hunting and the cub petting industry, Kevin implements a no breeding policy. Additionally, the sanctuary does not have available space for the animals in his care to breed. Therefore, he fits the lions with a contraceptive implant. You can check out the video below to understand more about this and why it is done for many lionesses in South Africa.

The sanctuary contains 13 predator enclosures with a large central enrichment area. The animals in the enclosures are unable to be completely wild as their home is situated within a national park with other lions roaming freely. As territorial animals, if one pride of lions came across another, there would be a fight to the death.

Instead, Richardson tracks the location of the wild lions, and takes those who reside in the enclosures for enrichment walks in areas where they will not come into conflict. Richardson claims that this activity helps to keep their innate wild instincts stimulated, such as their senses of smell and taste.

You can see many videos on Kevin’s YouTube channel where the lions are engaging in wild behaviour during these walks, as they stalk potential prey and socialise with members of their groups, including Kevin. In the video below, Kevin takes captive lions, Vayetsi, Livy and Ginny, for an enrichment walk, where they can be seen interacting with both Kevin and their surroundings.

Video from Richardsons Youtube Channel.

Why Is It Not As Simple As We May Think?

While many have argued that Kevin’s practices with the lions that reside in his wildlife sanctuary cannot be classed as conservation, he is a self-proclaimed conservationist and Zoologist who declares to operate with the aim of spreading awareness of the plight of wild lions, and those in captivity.

Some, such as online blog Icarus Inc. feel that Kevin’s method of looking after captive lions cannot be classed as true conservation as “there is no benefit in this for the greater good of the species.” The blog began as a research thesis regarding global conservation issues, and has blossomed into an online presence that aims to ‘merge the conservation world with the rest of the population’.

Photo credit: Kevin Richardson's Instagram @lionwhisperers

The argument whether Kevin’s work can be classed as conservation or not, can only be resolved by specifically defining conservation; but how do you reach a definitive conclusion about conservation when there are so many overlapping areas in which the concept branches off into?

Nevertheless, Richardson has millions of views on YouTube, has featured in all manner of news programs and documentaries, and has even broken records for viewer ratings. He has also written a book called ‘Part Of The Pride’, throughout all of which he seemingly tries to share his knowledge around lion conservation and spread awareness to the world.

The evidence provides no reason to doubt that his intentions are good, but are his practices beneficial, or detrimental to the lions in his care?

Exploitation And Humanisation

Online users, such as Icarus Inc and its subscribers, believe that Kevin’s interaction with the lions is exploitation. We have written blogs about how detrimental hands-on contact is with animals; it can completely collapse their wild foundations, causing them to become unfit for independent life in the wild. This is why many of our projects do not permit such contact, especially when they plan to release animals back into their natural habitat.

However, the CACLH support Richardson’s practices, and feel they are completely ethical because “he rescues these lions, and it is their choice whether they want to interact with him or not”. Additionally, the lions at The Kevin Richardson Wildlife Sanctuary will never be able to return to the wild as they have been in captivity since they were cubs or have been rescued from the wildlife trade, and would never survive without sanctuary care as a result.

Therefore, could it be suggested that the lions are that humanised, that they depend on human interaction to have a stimulated life?

There’s No ‘But’ In Conservation

The Icarus Group claim that “the word ‘but’ in regard to conservation is a dangerous, and insidious thing”. They expressed their opinions with regards to Richardson’s practices in a blog post earlier this year;

“aside from issuing medical attention or for purposes of rehabilitation, there is no benefit for the animal in having humans handle or touch it.”

They go on to claim that “it’s exploitative” to continue those practices outside of these purposes and “label it as conservation.” They explain further with an analogy relating to domestic abuse in humans: “when you are dealing with a public looking to you for examples of how to protect wild animals, you must make yourself an ideal example. A child who witnesses domestic violence, even if as a child they are told that hitting people is wrong, is at a much higher risk to subsequently abuse their domestic partner.”

The analogy suggests that, despite easily accessible knowledge regarding vulnerable species and the struggles they face, easily influenced people (such as children) could still replicate these actions. If they see someone who claims to be a public figure within conservation acting in a way that the industry to which he belongs categorically says not to, there is the potential for lines to be blurred. This then results in the continuation of human’s actions having a detrimental effect on the lion species for generations to come.

Photo credit: Kevin Richardson's Instagram @lionwhisperersa

But are Richardson’s practices exploitative? As previously mentioned, The CACLH claim the animals "choose" to interact with him, and Kevin appears to back this up in another YouTube video when seemingly play fighting with a lioness (“you can see her claws are not out. She is playing and talking.”)

But are the animals choosing to interact, or have they been domesticated into doing so? Do they enjoy the interaction with Kevin, and do they really mean him no harm? There are many questions to answer here…

Man And Beast Become One – Right Or Wrong?

Icarus go on to say that The Kevin Richardson Wildlife Sanctuary is not GFAS (Global Federation of Animal Welfare) certified. The Global Federation of Animal Welfare has “established standards of care and operation for 25 different groups of animals”, and these guidelines are used to “evaluate sanctuaries, rescue centres, and rehabilitation centres in a thorough and rigorous manner”. They assert that organisations who comply with these standards are “recognised with accreditation or verification status and the public can be reassured that they provide humane and responsible care for their animals in a non-exploitative environment”.

Due the hands-on interaction between Kevin and the lions, the sanctuary will never be able to achieve GFAS verification, but does that mean he is having a detrimental effect on the animals under his care?

Photo credit: Kevin Richardson's Instagram @lionwhisperersa

Members of the public who have expressed their views on social media (by leaving comments on Richardson's various social platforms) have gone as far as to make claims that Kevin Richardson really does exploit his animals: as his YouTube videos are edited, only scenes of animals appearing to be happy and playful are included and shared to his millions of worldwide followers.

Aside from social media debates, and online trolls, it is extremely difficult to find conservation authorities having this conversation, and therefore it is equally difficult to draw a conclusion on the matter. Some feel that hands-on contact should never occur between man and beast, with one Facebook user commenting below one of Kevin’s posts:

“when a wild animal (even tame ones) are in a situation where they are interacting with man, something went wrong.”

Photo credit: Kevin Richardson's Instagram @lionwhisperersa

Followers of Richardson then jumped to his defence, claiming that he can be classified as a conservationist as he campaigns against the canned hunting and the cub petting industry (the official site for The Campaign Against Canned Hunting specifically refers to Kevin and his contributions to the cause.)

His fans argue that the lions in his care cannot survive in the wild, but it is only Kevin with whom they interact with in this way, and therefore should not be considered to be ‘tame’, so are they, therefore, truly humanised or domesticated?

Kevin explains in many of his videos that he can have this contact with the lions because he has raised them since they were cubs, and he has managed to construct this unique relationship without beating or chaining them, or causing them distress in any way. Encounters and walks with the lions that Richardson has filmed and shared to his YouTube channel frequently see him warning guests to stay back and stay vigilant around the animals whilst in the safari truck, and they stay safely behind the enclosure barriers whilst Kevin goes in.

Comments are ever changing, and people’s opinions are being expressed on his social media sites every single day. If you would like to review then you can see for yourself on his Facebook page and YouTube channel.

Ethical And Medicinal Controversy

Photo credit: Kevin Richardson's Instagram @lionwhisperersa

Africa Geographic help to shed light on some medical reasons why hands-on contact with animals should never occur too. As Fiona Miles continues her interview with them, she explains that “interaction with wild animals serves no positive influence on the animals. Animals that are utilised for human interaction will invariably become habituated and lose any fear of humans.”

She also goes on to say that habituation increases the risk to both animal and human along with a rise in the risk of transferring disease. Africa Geographic say: “ethically any interaction between a human and an animal ultimately lowers the welfare of the animal.” More questions arise with this, such as, surely animals in sanctuary care will be at less of a risk of catching disease as there are medical professionals present? What about the animals that come into the sanctuaries and are already habituated? They depend on human care to survive, so where do we draw the line?

What It all Boils Down To – What Do You Think?

At this stage in the debate, the complexities stigmatised with conservation come to light, because there does not seem to be a simple, straightforward solution.

Many conservationists - whether they dedicate their lives to it, or, like many of us, who dedicate fragments of time and money to wildlife organisations- have claimed that lion conservation is not just collectively about preserving or breeding lions for species continuation. The sad fact is, there simply is not as much natural habitat for lions to roam in as there once was.

This could suggest that conserving lions by breeding them could add more to the problem rather than aiding it, as too many lions with too little range could lead to unbalanced prey-to-predator ratios, and of course more conflict with humans.

Habitat loss, trophy hunting and other factors have meant that along with the decline in lion populations, the abundance of prey available to them and a depletion in roaming ranges, more and more pressure is being placed on lion populations. Consequently, some feel that the focus of lion conservation should be centred around prohibiting trophy hunting, cub petting and further destruction of lion habitat, but what is the best way to care for the lions in captivity in the meantime? If space in the wild is not freely available or self-sustaining, how can we guarantee captive conditions are sufficient for these big cats?

Humans are accountable for domesticating some lions, knowingly and unknowingly, but are the lions in Kevin’s care truly humanised if it is just Kevin they’re interacting with? Is Kevin wrong for continuing these interactions? The questions continue…

But do you think you may have an answer? Let us know if you are for or against Kevin Richardson’s methods in the poll below.

When asked by a Sky news producer if he was interfering with nature by having this unusual relationship with lions, Richardson responds:

“I think we interfered with nature the day we put these animals in enclosures.”

But what do you think?

Share this Article...

Share this article with your friends and followers by using the social media buttons below.

Leave a Comment...

Wanting to add something to this story or just let us know your thoughts? Just leave your comments below. Please be aware that all comments will be moderated: abusive behaviour or self-promotion will not be allowed.

500 characters remaining

Has this blog inspired you to volunteer? If so, why not enquire today? Simply fill out an enquiry form, and allow a member of our travel team to assist with your query! Please note that blog comments are not monitored by the travel team, so any questions related to bookings may be missed.

Julie Allison Baker commented 3 weeks ago
Kevin Richardson is abusing his animals by not letting them live free in the wild. He has brainwashed and manipulated his followers that he is not a monster who keeps 36 lions abused in captivity. He promised that he would free them, but, is making millions from them. He doesn’t love them; he uses them for his own means just like Machiavelli, another monster. They’re not allowed to run and play in the wild, catch their own food, be like lions. He also steals the lionesses newborns to use in film

500 characters remaining
Agnes Smythe
replied 3 weeks ago
From this sight: "Enforcing a 'no animal contact' policy for animals that are in the process of rehabilitation and subsequent release." Kevin isn't releasing lions back into the wild, nor breeding them. They would have died if not for his intervention. He takes great care of these lions who arrived as abused or very sick cubs (as an example one that has bones that barely formed correctly due to malnutrition). You sound off balance and are a destructive force to ALL good sanctuaries. SHAME!
replied 3 weeks ago
This sounds like defamation. Do you have any proof for your insane claims? If so we'd all like to see it. Post it lady, we want to know what you're talking about. There are no lionesses having cubs, he is a rehab sanctuary for abused animals who can't be released back into the wild. He has 26 lions not 36 so get your story straight. As he last stated when moving camp, he won't be adding any more lions and most likely due to people like you sponsored by globalists, who wish to take control.
Stephen Shepherd commented 3 months ago
I myself think he should let some breeding happen to give the lions some sense of being more natural.

500 characters remaining
Rebecca commented 3 months ago
If they were born in captivity the options are limited. To be provided for well or poorly, both beyond their control. If he's not breeding or adding adults while providing an environment and care until they pass away, the animals won the lottery. Many are elderly and several have passed away in recent years, the situation is self limiting. His hands on approach is a crap shoot, he's entitled to take. Hopefully experience and luck will prevail.

500 characters remaining
Julie Allison
replied 3 weeks ago
Rebecca your ignorance is not your fault. Kevin Richardson is a lying narcissistic manipulative brain-washer and has got you exactly where he wants you; to fight others for him who see his true monster self. He wants to be the leader and control the most powerful animals on the planet. That’s why men hunt, which has proven is a diagnosis as psychopathic. Trophy hunters seek to kill and prove they’re stronger than lions. Just like Richardson, who is worse, keeps them imprisoned.
No commented 5 months ago
People need to learn the difference between and wildlife sanctuary and and wildlife rehabilitation. They are two different things people. Wildlife sanctuary are for animals that CANT return to the wild. While wildlife rehabilitation is to prepare them for the wild. He is running a sanctuary, so human interaction is NOT THE END OF THEIR SPECIES? Tf? Worry more about hunters, canning, pet trade instead of a man who is saving the animals and giving them a home. Despicable.

500 characters remaining
No commented 5 months ago
Every comment that is against human contact is overly emotional and sensitive. First of it is not Richardson’s responsibility to intellectually babysit people who lack common sense. If they don’t know not to interact with the wildlife THEY are stupid. He is running an sanctuary where animals CANT return to the wild, THOSE are the animals he is interacting with. Now if those animals were to return to the wild, some could argue it would be wrong. BUT THEY ARE NOT. He giving them a home, chill.

500 characters remaining
Julie Allison
replied 3 weeks ago
The person who said that Kevin is saving them because they can’t go back into the wild is extremely uninformed and has the audacity to criticize other people’s comments that they’re stupid and ignorant. You’re very brainwashed. I guess you never seen Born Free or Christian the Lion where both lions , who had been domesticated, were helped to get back into the wild where they belong. Kevin is a psychopath.
Declan commented 6 months ago
He stated in a video that he doesn't plan to buy or breed any more lions, and once the last one dies he will only rehabilitate wild lions and then return them to the wild.

500 characters remaining
Julie Allison
replied 3 weeks ago
He’s such a liar and I can’t believe how many fall for his lies and deceptions. Richardson fans you’re all sheep.
Logistics Bazaar commented 1 year ago
Marine coverage affords insurance for harm or loss associated with a vessel, cargo, berth, transport, or transfer. In different words, a marine coverage coverage covers loss or harm round a ship. Of course, particular standards decide insurance and what is probably involved, including your boat on shore, out of the water, or sitting to your garage. This determines how protection influences your coverage premiums.
<a href="">services</a>

500 characters remaining
Heather commented 2 years ago
My question is, what happens to the lions and the sanctuary after Kevin dies?

500 characters remaining
Diane commented 2 years ago
I appreciate that he rescues them, does not breed them and provides a good life for them. He can interact with them all he wants. I want to hug those big mushes too! However, posting the videos may encourage the horrible practice of Ignorant egotistical people to want them as pets.

500 characters remaining
Brenda Zink commented 2 years ago
I think he’s wonderful and I am totally jealous, as I’m 62& have wanted to hig a “hairy headed Lion” since I been like 2 years old!!! ( and a Hyenna) I BEG to be able to go work with Kevin!!ii. I ran a pitbull rescue for years.

500 characters remaining
Esther commented 3 years ago
Thank you for the post and this is a very complex issue. While I do believe Richardson is promoting a good cause and is not harming the lions in his care, I don't believe it is right for him to interact with the lions in pictures and video's. People look up to him and he is setting an example. By posting these pictures and video's he is suggesting that it is ok to interact with wild animals.

500 characters remaining
Carolina Masini commented 3 years ago
I really liked and appreciate your post, it’s not easy to go agains the “common sense” but you definitely did it with greatness. There is, obvious, something wrong there, because it’s not natural for a WILD animal to be touched by humans, it’s exactly the same that is happeing right now with the elephant “sanctuary” in Southeast Asia, a lot of tourists go there thinking they are helping the animals, but it’s not natural for a wild animal to be touched by hundreds of tourists everyday. Thank you

500 characters remaining
Kim commented 3 years ago
This is the most ridiculous character assassination I have read. Richardson has the healthiest and happiest lions on the planet. He is teaching people about lions, he does focus on the plight of lions in the wild, he admits that given the choice he would rather his lions had been proper wild lions, born in the wild, but they were not. Was he supposed to turn his back and walk away or give them the best life possible? After all. it was not their fault. You are just stirring up trouble.

500 characters remaining
replied 1 year ago
Amen! If it were not for him, these lions would all have died. He has provided safe homes for these animals. They have been abused and mistreated until he took them in. Not counting the egotistical hunters who kill these beautiful animals simply to show off their so-called trophies. If it were not for people like him, so many lions would have lost their lives. Stop condemning a man for doing what is right.
Michelle murdoch commented 3 years ago
Having watched many of the you tube videos, acknowledging my knowledge is only from reading, not being impacted by the lions living next to my home I think Richardson is right to start looking for different approaches to very complex problems. The animals under his administration seem well cared for, have great vet care and for lions in captivity I would say I pretty good standard of living but what he seems to be saying is lions deserve adequate habitat & better educated human interaction.

500 characters remaining
Joan gavornik
replied 3 years ago
I have always felt Kevin is a remarkable man...I always dreamed of having such relationships with these wild, beautiful creatures...I believe in him and his love and dedication to these animals and his protection for them. As we all know, they certainly are in great danger as their population has decreased so much,,,I have pictures of lions and tigers and what not in my little studio...I talk to them everyday as if they were real...Thank you...joan
Renee Tibbetts commented 4 years ago
He made a promise to Tau and Napolian 20+ years ago to see that they were taken care of. He followed thru on that promise. I like his set up at his sanctuary. Their kept clean he takes his lions on walks for hours to stimulate them. He has regular vet care and recently dental care done. And one lion is sickly you can see in Kevin's face the worry and fear he has for that lion in his care. And he wears that worry in his appearance. He LOVES those lions he fought for them and he would die for them

500 characters remaining
Renee Tibbetts commented 4 years ago
I DO NOT think Kevin Richardson is harming the lions in his care. 1) as we know the majority of his lions were interacted with Kevin at early ages (cubs) from his previous job at an animal park. Tau and Napolian and Meg and Amy were bottle fed by Kevin and raised by Kevin.
2) upon working at this park and becoming attached to his work with the cubs and later lions he could not stand by and watch them being sold for hunting. So he devoted his life to watch them grow to old age and educate❤

500 characters remaining
Zeis commented 4 years ago
I'm for Kevin Richardson , I've seen most of his videos how he interact with the lions and other animals in his sanctuary. The animals were relaxed looks healthy, reaching their full life of maturity and didn't see any signs of stress. Even if he edited his videos there were volunteers who watched him on the side and they too shares and leaved good comments about their experiences in Kevin's sanctuary . I never knew about canned hunting nor the role of petting zoo till Kevin brought awareness

500 characters remaining
Pandora commented 4 years ago
You wrote:
"Aside from social media debates, and online trolls, it is extremely difficult to find conservation authorities having this conversation, and therefore it is equally difficult to draw a conclusion on the matter."

Exactly! That's because Kevin Richardson is only "controversial" amongst trolls like ICARUS (defunct, but rebranded). Lionsrock, Richardson & CACLH are in it for the lions. You don't need a conservation authority to weigh in - you can just trust your gut on this one.

500 characters remaining
Lindy Loo commented 4 years ago
Keep up the good work Kevin, the morons who disagree with what you do are talking thru their backside and have nothing better to do. You are an amazing person who has a special gift doing the most wonderful work for these beautiful animals. I look forward to hearing your talk in Perth during October.

500 characters remaining
Nancy commented 4 years ago
ICARUS staff are ALL animal exploiters themselves. They don't uphold their own standard of "but". They all gave themselves a pass in their personal lives while going after others for exploitation.

500 characters remaining
Suzanne Long commented 4 years ago
The lions in Kevin Richard's care where all orphans. I believe that he has nothing but the best intensions. He takes wonderful care of all the animals in his care. Everyone has an opinion. Whether he is right or wrong he is not breeding the lions. I believe he has a gift the lions in his care were orphans and he raised them from Cubs. His calling is the lions live and let live!

500 characters remaining
Becky smith commented 4 years ago
Kevin is trying to conserve these great animals and is doing a great job!

500 characters remaining
Mark McC commented 4 years ago
I’m for Kevin Richardson and the work he does too. He gives a lot of enrichment to the animals and where would the lions be if he hadn’t stepped in. Critics should give the guy a break. The people I’m critical of are the can hunters and trophy hunters.

500 characters remaining
Kimberly Krause commented 4 years ago
I am for Kevin Richardson. He has rescued many of his lion from very poor environments.
His Awareness and educational talks on canned hunting, lion farms, petting "zoos" are alarming; but the more Awareness on these topics will hopefully get the attention they need to eventually stop these practices.
And he talks about habitat loss and questions how to go about reversing this matter. This topic of habitat loss effects all the species in Africia.
Go Kevin!

500 characters remaining
Roxy commented 5 years ago
Icarus Inc's negative stance on Kevin Richardson's efforts is too extreme. Firstly, Kevin does not propose for people to directly interact with lions as he does. Secondly, raising awareness on the state of lions today (e.g. canned hunting industry, loss of habitat) is part of conservation too. Thirdly, organizations like Icarus Inc. need to concentrate on actual enemies of lions (cub petting farms, poachers, etc) and not on Kevin who is doing his best to protect these animals.

500 characters remaining
mary atkinson commented 5 years ago
ICARUS Inc is a self-appointed judge in the conservation field, closely connected to Captive Wildlife Watchdog. Their information is not uniformly accurate. Their viewpoint is dogmatic. That is not unusual in conservation but I am repelled by the aggressive tone the members take towards anyone unfortunate enough to displease them. Richardson is treated to plain nastiness. He is unusual and they disapprove of him to the extreme, it is unbalanced. More objectivity required, please.

500 characters remaining
Lori commented 5 years ago
A lion already used to human contact should not be put in a cage with no further human contact. It is cruelty. For such lions some kind human contact should continue. The "no human contact " rule should only apply to truly wild lions in sanctuaries, but such sanctuaries should have a very large area where the lions can be let out to walk, run or play.

500 characters remaining
Put your horse at medium level commented 5 years ago
Petting and wild life parks and zoos and circuses have existed before. Kevin didn't start people's wish to interact with wild animals. Most people just can't do what he does and there is not a huge profit in caring for rescued animals. Kevin's lions are some of the happiest and healthiest I've seen among sanctuaries. Let's not pretend other animals confined to a small space with no human interaction are having a great quality of life with no problems. If it makes their lives better, why not?

500 characters remaining
Janna Arendt commented 5 years ago
I am sure that this man loves lions. However, showcasing this kind of interactions only encourages the Kevin-wanna-be of this world, and there are many of them. Every time we saw his videos with others, the vast majority marveled (of course) and said: "I want to do that too!" Then when we reminded that it's not doable unless you have the type of history this man has (adding that Kevin Richardson also advised against it), then again the answers were "if he does it, I can too". There you go...

500 characters remaining
Antsa commented 6 years ago
My issue with Kevin is that yes, he may have a bond with his animals but the funeral public will see him doing this and want to replicate this. Although he preaches against doing what he is doing, in a trip to S.A. earlier this year, there is a billboard on the exit from Kruger at the Phalaborwa gate for Tzaneen predator park, where you can do exactly as he does. So you can go to the park and play with adult lions in the same manner as Kevin. You can't condemn one thing while doing that thing...

500 characters remaining

Featured Blog Arcticles

Featured Videos

Experience The Namibia Wildlife Sanctuary

See what you could get up to as a volunteer at the Namibia Wildlife Sanctuary! This volunteer project offers you the chance to get up close and personal with some of the country's most iconic species.

Discover The Great White Shark Project

Come face to face with one of the world’s most misunderstood predators whilst aiding great white shark conservation. As a volunteer, not only will you get the incredible opportunity to dive with sharks, but you will also assist the team in raising awareness of the great white as you work alongside tourists and local school children to provide them with knowledge of the local environment and the importance of living in harmony with South Africa’s marine life.

Volunteers Review Their Experience at the Nyaru Menteng Orangutan Sanctuary

Volunteers talk about their recent experience at the Nyaru Menteng Orangutan Sanctuary in Borneo.

Latest Blog Arcticles

It’s Orangutan Release Time!

It’s Orangutan Release Time!

12 more orangutans have been successfully released back...

Meet 12 orangutan candidates up for release!

Meet 12 orangutan candidates up for release!

Thanks to the hard work and dedication of the Borneo...

Linda's Samboja Lestari Orangutan Adventure

Linda's Samboja Lestari Orangutan Adventure

Linda Duchin volunteered at the Samboja Lestari Orangutan...

Two Rewilded Cheetahs, Two Years On - A Remarkable Rewilding Story

Two Rewilded Cheetahs, Two Years On - A Remarkable Rewilding Story

Join us on a remarkable rewilding journey as we revisit the...

Janet & Mick's Unforgettable Gorilla Adventure

Janet & Mick's Unforgettable Gorilla Adventure

Janet and Mick joined The Great Gorilla Project last year...

The Team Returns - James & Lauren's South Africa Experience

The Team Returns - James & Lauren's South Africa Experience

Lauren and James have returned and are ready to relay tales...

The Great Projects On Tour: Upcoming Staff Trips

The Great Projects On Tour: Upcoming Staff Trips

Team members Lauren and James, joined colleague Georgia to...

Lynne's Top Tips For Volunteering at the Nyaru Menteng Orangutan Sanctuary

Lynne's Top Tips For Volunteering at the Nyaru Menteng Orangutan Sanctuary

Volunteer Lynne Coe shares her valuable tips on what to...

Where you can go
Contact Info
UK Office
The Great Traveller Ltd,
3 Dairy Yard
Star Street
Ware, Hertfordshire
SG12 7DX
United Kingdom

Opening hours:
   Mon-Fri 8:30am–5:30pm
   Sat 10am-4pm

T: +44(0) 208 885 4987